What You Should Know About the Dental Implant Industry

Advances in dentistry within the last ten years or so have led to developments that were incredible. Dental implants have become the treatment of choice to replace lost or missing teeth, and success rates have exceeded 95% if done under appropriate surgical technique. When the concept of osseointegration or fusing titanium with bone was introduced to the dental area in the early 60s by an orthopedic surgeon known as P.I. Branemark, the application of the concept was adapted to dental usage; implementing the procedure, nevertheless, into a dental atmosphere was seen as risky and unpredictable. Success rates in this point in time rarely approached 55-60%, and clinicians felt that their debut into an individual’s treatment plan may be premature for the predictable achievement of a specific prosthesis. To improve achievement rates, alterations in the design of the implant surface were introduced without audio, clinical signs. Through years of empirical experimentation, a titanium implant has been developed that looked much.

Some 40 years later, the technology inside the dental implant discipline has facilitated their colloquial use among general dentists and specialists. After the market for implant dentistry exploded not more than a decade ago, many implant manufacturers decided to alter the topographical surface of the implant housing with unsubstantiated claims of enhanced success rates to win market share over the leading implant companies that now hold 85-95% of US dental implant sales.

Unfortunately, there is an immense amount of badly written research that is being introduced into the dental literature together with false promises of improved success prices. In several instances, implant manufacturers have made changes to the design of the implant because of success rates observed with a rival implant which has clinical documentation and the research. With the implant industry annually, growing, this problem won’t ever cease to exist.

As a possible implant candidate, There Are Numerous things you should know about this industry Before continuing with therapy:

FACT: Physicians do not need formal surgical training on humans to place dental implants.

In fact, one implant manufacturer, in particular, holds educational conferences for doctors wanting to place dental implants over the course of one weekend. That is right, in only 2 days, doctors receive a training certificate which claims that they may place dental implants in a human subject and have training in operative implant dentistry. Sad to say, the course doesn’t train these physicians on individual subjects, instead, on jawbones that are plastic.

FACT: The US government doesn’t need FDA approval for a dental implant fixture to be marketed to the professional community.

The US government has a governing body which manages biomedical devices and their potential implementation to the medical and dental community. Then the governing body will give 510K clearance into the implant manufacturer, if, by way of example, a dental implant meets certain criteria required for placement into the human body based on submissions by other manufacturers which have analyzed the device. The 510K clearance enables dental implant manufacturers (along with other biomedical device makers ) to advertise their device with no need for previous animal or human testing! Then the literature for the initial product can be used to formalize 510K clearance if another device has been formally introduced with a similar intention.

FACT: So many implants, so little time

The rivalry for the dental implant market is ferocious, and after patents have expired on analyzed devices are proven to be more acceptable for individual use, some implant manufacturers will duplicate the design of those devices. Implant manufacturers looking for a place in the dental implant market will copy the design of an implant that has an expired patent, save for a change here and there. These implants are known as clones and are promoted to dentists in a significantly reduced fee. In most instances, these implant clones have NO documentation to substantiate the claims of their manufacturer. In reality, these businesses use literature provided from whom they are copying! Azarko Dental

FACT: Implant manufacturers are introducing new designs to the market with false claims

To stay on top of new implant manufacturers that are having better overall success rates, some companies will copy a certain part of their competitor’s augmentation and assert that results are much like the recently added portion. That makes sense, but generally, a combination of design features are accountable for a few manufacturers’ success rates. By introducing a notion that has shown to boost success rates in another implant system (albeit with minimal or no clinical signs ), augmentation producers can consequently retain their current clientele, and so physicians need not worry about needing to buy another implant system.

FACT: Clone companies always falter and eliminate market share, leading to withdrawal from the market place.

Dental implants are metals and alloys fatigue. Many of implant manufacturers who have cloned other systems have gone bankrupt and as a result, can provide the dental profession their merchandise. Oftentimes when components for these systems that are implanted fail, it’s impossible or very hard to buy replacement parts. This may leave the patient that has had a cloned implant positioned in their jaw together with the unfortunate position of being unable to have it revived.

FACT: The US FDA does not call for dentists to notify their patients of the type of dental implant being placed.

There are more than 90 dental implant manufacturers competing for market share in the United States; in those 90 or so implant producers, over 340 different implant designs can be found!!!! Sadly, this number is increasing, and it is going to be hard for dentists to identify. https://www.azarkodental.com/site/home

Written by